On 04/13/2012 07:42 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Strings already kind of are a magic special case. They are the one non-builtin type that is by far the most used one, close to the builtin ones (which is part of the reason why many programming languages do have strings as a builtin type). So I see nothing wrong with trying to get them as conveniently usable as possible, as ::any::little::annoynance::there AddsUpNumerousTimesL BECAUSE_THE_THING_IS_USED_SO_OFTEN.
I am not objecting to the goal of frequently used entities having reasonably short names. I am objecting to the hacky implementation.
(And, at least in my book, the rtl:: prefix is already reasonably short. What sucks is the "O" in "OUString"...)
Stephan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
