On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:58 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:27 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > maybe the proposed gtk3 one is sufficient for gtk3, > > definitely the alternative impl *seems* ok for gtk2 is I enable it > > locally experimentally. > > Really ? I recall reading gdkevents, consulting the mainatiners and > tearing my hair over this when I arrived at that solution - having > decided not to pull and re-push all the events to avoid confusing > some-part-or-other of gtk+ (but hopefully I was mistaken).
Well, unsure of it of course, but with just that bit toggled on for gtk2 nothing seemed obviously different on a casual walk-through. With or without for gtk3 seems to equally odd results for redraws and so forth, so hard to tell if I've broken that, quite possibly. > We should prolly remove all the slow & heavy-lifting addEvent / > subtractEvent / resetEvents code if we do it this way though - there is > no need for that anymore. Yeah. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice