On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:24 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I think it looks pretty good now anyway FWIW, I'd initially wanted to
> build up an incremental chain, but knew I wouldn't get (even the simple
> case) right in any reasonable length of time. Glad I didn't try given
> the "busted storages, but we happen to stick to the fairly ok bits when
> reading" case :-)
:-)
> I don't know of any specific other examples outside of the existing
> "special" ole2 cases we have in the regression tests. At least
> collecting those together as cppunit tests has had some some payoff.
Yep - having the test harness there was a Godsend for writing the
backwards reading / directory traversal test :-)
Pushed to -3-5 with your sign-off.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
