Hi UX-Advise, *,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess with all of this said my question still is, should I mark the bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47969 > report as WONTFIX and just have a comment why? [...] > Let me know and I'll pass on the message to the user (or someone else can > throw a comment in the bug if you'd like). We'll let ux-advise have a decision, that's one of the reason for having that instance :-) So summary of http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-June/033552.html ( http://www.mail-archive.com/libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org/msg32164.html ). A short thread, no worries, but for your convenience: ######## Should Asian and CTL language support be enabled by default (& maybe the option removed completely)? Cons: * More UI controls/dialog tabpages that might confuse users * visible cursor travelling, input sequence checking and detection of writing mode that are only active for CTL might have a tiny performance impact Pros: * One less entry in Tools|Options (in case it is removed completely) * not treating CTL/Asian scripts as second class (<quote>not to mention that "Asian" is a so ignorant orientalistic term in this context</quote>) * will work out-of the box for all users Why can't it be set depending on the LO-language used? * Many CTL users don't use localized interface, so there's no correlation * there is no per-langauge-options mechanism yet, so it has to be introduced/workarounded by bundled extensions or similar and thus complicate the code/installation ######## So please discuss & decide :-) - Thanks a lot. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
