Marco Cecchetti wrote: > The final jump is due to the fact that the "deactivate" method of > an animation node invokes the managed activity "end" method that > in turn calls "performEnd" which evaluates the animation by passing > the final time value (usually 1.0, or 0.0 if the animation is > reversed). > > By commenting out the call to the "performEnd" method the duration > attribute on the <par> time container is handled correctly and > I can't see any side effect for usual animations. > Hi Marco,
the bug along which this got added is https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=45197 - please try that scenario. Then again, the comments in those performEnd methods suggest it might not be the final solution. ;) > However I'm wondering if it is worth to perform such a modification > in order to be more conforming to SMIL when such a feature is never > used. Moreover even if I can see no side effect by removing the call > to the "performEnd" method, I'm also sure that has been placed there > for some good reason (can anyone help me here ?) > Would love to have it (properly) fixed - see above. :) Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgp4ugfws79Yj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
