On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote: > Machine cannot determine dependency among patches, and I see no reason here > to try to do so nevertheless, with whatever heuristic. Rather, I prefer if > the user has to mark patches as dependent or not. If the current interface > makes it too easy for users to erroneously mark patches as dependent, then > we should consider redesigning the interface.
Think of it as a graph. A set of patch based on a known base is presumed to be order-dependant, because they _could_ and typically are. so when gerrit receive a set of new patches on top of a given base he rightly assume that their order _is_ important. I know this is a problem for those whose workflow involve piling a bunch of unrelated patches and then pushing once a day or so. There are some scripting that has and can be done to accommodate this workflow. Norbert > > Stephan > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice