On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lu...@suse.cz> wrote: > On Monday 23 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lu...@suse.cz> wrote: >> > On Sunday 22 of July 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> ... but I used a simple grep + >> >> sed to extract INPATH= simpler and most importantly avoid using >> >> 'make' on platform for which that may not resolve to a gnumake. >> > >> > You forgot to tell grep what to grep for, so if anybody has updated >> > after this, please pull again. >> > >> >> I added the push of LibO*.zip files in push_nightlies.sh. >> > >> > Is there any point in uploading a .zip file with a Windows build? >> >> I suspect that the 2 are exclusive right... so either there is a zip or a >> msi so push_nightlies.sh should not care and do a best effort > > They are not exclusive. Right now 'make build' creates .msi again after I > partially reverted the dev-install change, and dev-install builds the .zip . > So a tinderbox with the latest tinbuild that uploads nightlies and builds > also tests now presumably uploads both. > > I don't know which one is better (and I think plain build should not create > either), but as I said, I don't see a reason to upload both.
to provide a choice to the would be tester ? so he could choose the zip or msi according to what is convenient for him ? Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
