On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 25/07/12 23:35, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> the problem with the duplication is that the next time somebody fixes a >>> problem with the "dev-install" target they will probably forget to fix >>> the "install-tb" target as well, and if the problem affects tinderboxes >>> as well then they will remain broken. whether that is more likely, or >>> whether a change to --disable-linkoo is more likely, is of course >>> speculative. >> >> True... >> There is one aspect we missed... install-tb does _not_ depend on the >> 'build' target (and no -o build did not prevent the whole shebang to >> be built) > > yes, the problem is that make does not propagate some options like -W > and -o to sub-makes, and the top-level Makefile only handles rebuilding > configure; the workaround is to invoke it like this: > > make -f Makefile.top dev-install -o build
Thanks, good to know... but let me ask you then: what is more likely: - that someone changed the way that dev-install works in the Makefile and missed install-tb in the same make file a bit below... or - that someone change how the Makefile recursion thingy works and forget to update bin/tinbuild_phases.sh (*) in the contrib/buildbot repo ? :-D Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice