On Saturday 13 of October 2012, oger000 wrote: > Preface: I am a novice in many things. > > To get familiar with the stringclasses I chose the "rtl namespace prefix > removal" because I have seen some patches of this kind on the mailinglist. > > My questions: > > 1) I did not find background info - at least not at > <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/String_Classes> why the > removing of the "rtl::" namespace prefix is preferable. > > Any pointers? - or is it more a cosmetic cleanup?
Yes, it is more of a cosmetic cleanup - the classes are already in practice namespaced by the O prefix and so not explicitly adding the rtl:: prefix is avoiding the nuisance of the extra writing and also, since these are very commonly uses classes, makes the code more readable. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
