Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > * should we kill [oneway] in IDL while at it? IIRC it went away in > > the bridges anyway, via i#116038 or didn't it? > > Yes, [oneway] is effectively completely dead by now (compared to > almost dead before the binary URP rewrite). > Killing in progress.
> > * a bit more extreme - kill ::com::sun::star inside office code, by > > having a ~global "using namespace ::com::sun::star;" or > > "namespace api = ::com::sun::star;" in e.g. sal/config.h, and > > writing only _that_ out in the generated c++ headers? > > (of course keep the old namespace for SDK. And yes, it's no new > > idea, just a bit less extreme as what's proposed in the wiki) > > namespace css = com::sun:.star is the de-facto standard there, so > yes, I wouldn't mind using that in the generated headers. > using namespace com::sun::star would save some 5 additional characters - let me see what a test build yields... Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpcoJVHEf5fw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
