On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:02:45PM +0000, Noel Power wrote: > On 14/01/13 13:16, Eike Rathke wrote: > >Hi Noel, > > > >On Monday, 2013-01-14 12:49:42 +0000, Noel Power wrote: > [...] > > ^^^^^ > >I meant to write 4-0-1 there.. > somehow I read it as that > >>pushed to 4.0, further reviews needed for 4-0-0 > >Well, thanks, but, hum.. We don't have a 4-0-0 branch yet, so being on > >4-0 now means it will land in 4.0.0 anyhow ... > gah you are right ( seems I am too used to 3.6 ) > > maybe we should at least > >have the late feature consense in hindsight? > yes, Petr, Kendy what's the chances for this, should we wait a day > or 2 or just revert now
I'd not bother to revert unless that works. Incidentially, I would be against introduding a feature in 4.0.1, but would be OK with doing it before 4.0.0 ;-) (Especially as I already updated http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662798 assuming the ACKs were on IRC or something... ) Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
