Hi Matúš, sorry for the late reply.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 05:34:38PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone knows what should be the result of processing scp2 files? > Few $(OUTDIR)/bin/*.ins files but I mean the solenv/bin/modules/ thing. > We could install (copy) files directly with gbuild, so what would be > missing after removing scp2 ? > > Especially I don't understand the chaos in various modules (gid_Module_Foos) > - do we need them also for Windows? e.g. > scp2/source/activex/module_activex.scp > For Linux it's somehow used to create packages I think. > > Bjoern, do you have ideas how to continue with > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60924 ? > Marcos is doing great work there. > I'm not sure I can continue to mentor it - maybe we are doing good - > but I don't know which modules do we need in gbuild. Since with fdo#60924 gbuild knows about: - which layer a lib belongs to (and thus: were in the install it should end up) - which of the old gid_Module stuff a lib belongs to we should able to populate instdir/ on a gid_Module by gid_Module basis. In the long run, this should allow to conveniently build LibreOffice in parts. Of course, the gid_Modules differ somewhat as distros patched and modified it to their needs. We should find a decent default, but in the end distro will patch the package split to their needs anyway. The important advantage with having the module information in gbuild: one can shift a lib from one module to another, without having to tweak and patch _both_ the build and the install. Ideally, in the end IMHO one would be able to build and install parts of LibreOffice as in "make install_ure" or "make install_writer" ... Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
