Hi, On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:18:18AM -0800, bfoman wrote: > This proposal seems do not take into account Priority and Severity > combinations
How so? Or better: What usecase does the new workflow disrespect that worked before. FWIW, development didnt base anything on priority or severity so far, so what are we losing? > and IMHO is not possible with editbugs and canconfirm > privileges for everyone. Better to not have Pri-wars in the Bugzilla. Again: nothing is changing really wrt permission as before everyone had the permissions too to mark a MAB. > Anyway this workflow should be updated when there will be new bugs triage > policy change: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg. Yes. This is not yet a policy change, its about enabling to do one later. But FWIW, we had: - most MABs were not in priority highest - most priority highest were not MAB suggesting that the flowcharts was hardly followed at all (thus making priority mostly useless). IF everyone would have followed that flowchart, all priority highest would also have been MAB, which certainly was not at all the case. Ultimately, this: https://plus.google.com/+KoheiYoshida/posts/ZEPmsBjay8K is another reason for using priority, which inherently has multiple levels (unlike MABs) and is an inbuild feature of bugzilla without reinventing the wheel. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice