https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63154
--- Comment #54 from Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #6) > not sure who had the crazy idea of hard-coding "lo" into dozens of library > loading calls... but clearly that silly "lo" suffix serves no useful purpose > and we should just get rid of it in the build system, in which case > SVLIBRARY can be trivially replaced with SAL_MODULENAME. See bug 67313 for a rationale why the "lo" suffix is useful after all. (In reply to comment #53) > Any idea of where to put SVLIBRARY, or it can't be touched yet? In light of the above, I would still stick to comment 3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
