On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:18:51AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Ledure wrote: > On 13/05/2014 10:13, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >>> I presume it is compliant with the LO release policy to push the same >>> patch also to the LO 4.2 branch ?
>> I don't think so; no new features, only bugfixes. >> Can't an "installation as extension" override the bundled one, or >> something like that? > I don't see how: installing the extension on LO 4.2 makes that 2 > Basic libraries with the same name are present either in "My macros" > or in "LibreOffice macros". > To be used a library must first be loaded by giving its (presumably > unique) name ?? Yes, but one might hope that when loading the library, one source is always preferred over the other. With some luck, "My Macros & Dialogs" will always be preferred to "LibreOffice Macros & Dialogs". But maybe we are unlucky and it is other way round. (I think in general both ways make sense, as long as the choice is made consistently; some scenarios favour "priority to My Macros", other scenarios favour "priority to LibreOffice". By "luck" I mean "LibreOffice Basic was designed with the choice that suits our current scenario".) > The result is LO being unstable or corrupt. As in you tried and bad things happen? -- Lionel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice