On 10/06/14 12:47, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:22:16PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> You mean cmd.exe + coreutils should be enough? > > Ideally yes, plus some POSIX shell.
and i want a pony. there's a long list of Cygwin packages that are currently needed, and likely Cygwin is the most convenient way to install all this stuff: setup-x86.exe -P autoconf -P automake -P bison -P cabextract -P doxygen -P flex -P gcc-g++ -P git -P gnupg -P gperf -P libxml2-devel -P libpng12-devel -P make -P mintty -P openssh -P openssl -P patch -P perl -P perl_vendor -P pkg-config -P python -P readline -P rsync -P unzip -P vim -P wget -P zip https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies well a few of those look spurious, e.g. gcc-g++ is no longer needed, and i wonder why gnupg or openssh or rsync are on the list... >> Probably bash or some other POSIX shell too, surely? > > Yeah. Note that e.g. busybox already includes the ash shell. > >> Is there a non-Cygwin such that actually would support all the shell >> constructs we use? Is its complexity that much less than Cygwin's? > > busybox, msys, there are quite a few standalone bash ports. it's possible that Msys has a lot of the things we need, but perhaps not things like cabextract, doxygen, gperf, perl, python. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
