It is behavior that social movements
seek to change, not blah blah about 'values.'
I disagree. We need to change both, as every social movement does.
We can influence other people's values by
* Acting in accord with our values, and
* Talking about those values, so people understand why we do what we do.
So if you present these items in reverse order, 5 4 3 2 1, that is
much more likely to make sense to people - especially if there are
lots of concrete examples like 5, many slightly abstracted examples
like 4, something like the '4 freedoms' on the level of 3, perhaps a
few more ways of phrasing 2, and 1 is irreducible.
You might be right about that.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
