Aurelien said: > => *Problem:* Recommends non-free apps. > => *Problem:* No copyright header in the source files.
Including copyright and licensing information inside each nontrivial file is best because it helps to avoid ambiguity but it's not the only option. It's probably a good candidate for inclusion based on the first thing you mention but do any of the free GNU/Linux distributions include this program? I think most modifications to the list are first discussed on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1]. [1] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-linux-libre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
