Dnia środa, 25 lipca 2012 o 14:32:49 Ziv Leyes napisał(a): > People tend to "trust" big corporates, as silly as this may sound, > of course...
I know, but that's a different problem. > They will tend to trust big organized monsters to keep their data > safe, instead of trusting a home user like you and me, that could > be potentially a hacker Lulz. ;) Seriously, though, that's a problem of appearances and public perception, and Facebook + Microsoft are doing some great groundwork for us there lately. > But in any case, most users are not so concerned about the > "freedom" we're looking for, so this alternative to those services > should be a better choice, otherwise, we can just keep using the > existing services. But I like the idea, and I think it's doable, > again, not without a little hassle, someone needs to manage it, True. > some server needs to control and coordinate the communications. False. Look at BitTorrent and magnet links. Look at Tor. > That's why I think we don't need to reinvent the wheel, services > like sneer or friendica are already using this same principle so > why make yet another one if we already have one that's doing it > fine? Nowhere have I said we need to create a new service. If there are services that implement this idea, great, let's test them, use them, develop them and promote them. -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
