On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Rudolf <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there other projects that use the agpl? Maybe ask them why they chose > it. > > Could also argue in favour of the agpl by starting from user freedom which > seems to be the goal of the project. > That is a good line of argument.
In case I wasn't clear the first time, I need *other people* to post comments to the Tent folks. (That means you, dear reader.) This is because I don't think they would take kindly to more pestering from me, but if they see it's a larger issue than just one guy they might pay attention. > On Sep 28, 2012 1:53 PM, "Ramana Kumar" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tent looks somewhat promising to me as an alternative to centralised >> social networking. >> See https://tent.io for more details. >> >> They have started releasing software, and are currently using the "MIT >> license". >> I suggested they use Apache 2.0 or AGPL, but simply linking to the FSF's >> licensing page on why one might want to do that was not enough to convince >> them. >> I suspect comments from multiple other people may be more persuasive. >> >> So this is a call out for you to comment on this issue and see if we can >> get the Tent developers on board with better licensing. >> https://github.com/tent/tent-status/issues/4 >> >
