On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Rudolf <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there an existing https everywhere campaign you can join? > The closest thing I can find is https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere But that is not exactly a campaign. Do you know of one?
> I would also look into starting a petition somewhere. They usually don't > get much done but you can gauge support for the idea and point to it in > your emails. > > Despite this being a technical issue as Will Rico points out, they can at > least post an update on their blog about their progress on implementing > https everywhere. > Thanks, these are good ideas. I would appreciate knowing if anyone else is interested. > On Nov 21, 2012 9:40 AM, "Ramana Kumar" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does this response (below) make sense technically? >> I have my doubts. >> >> If it doesn't then I invite others on list to join me in putting some >> pressure on OkCupid, starting with just showing them how to deploy https >> and keep their ads. >> >> (If it does, then, depending on the details, perhaps that pressure should >> be directed at Google instead, to allow their ads to be embedded in sites >> served over https.) >> >> I am also trying to get doodle.com to serve only https. They have >> completely ignored me so far. Some more voices could be helpful. >> I know I can use https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/ instead, which is >> better on a number of fronts, when I initiate the poll, but people still >> send me doodle polls every so often. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Alice Goguen <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM >> Subject: Re: [BugProgramming] https (xrchz) >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> Hi, >> Thanks for your message. We can't offer https on the entire site because >> it would also prevent our ads from Google Ads from being served. Our >> developers are aware of the issue and would like to offer it when possible. >> Thanks, >> Alice >> >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:50 AM, OkCupid User Feedback < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Could you please enable https everywhere? Or tell me what is your reason >>> for selectively enabling https on only some portions of the site? >>> >>> I use a Javascript blocker which doesn't allow scripts on non-secure >>> sites. I've whitelisted okcupid.com, but it keeps apparently randomly >>> switching back and forth between https and http, and then breaks on the >>> http since it's so heavily Javascript-based. (I had to switch to an >>> untrusted one-off browser just to submit this bug report.) >>> >>> I persist in demanding https despite it breaking sites like yours >>> (though note it doesn't break bigger sites like Google or Wikipedia) >>> because I want a better web. Some of the reasons are spelled out here: >>> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/deploying-https. >>> >>> USER FACTS: >>> ----------- >>> User ID: 1134385026156797037 >>> Username: xrchz >>> >> >> >>
