El 31/01/2013 11:00, [email protected] escribió: > Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Call for testing: Qumble: Open-Source Software > distribution for Windows (Robert Martinez) > 2. Re: Call for testing: Qumble: Open-Source Software > distribution for Windows (Quiliro Ord??ez) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:39:55 +0100 > From: Robert Martinez <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Call for testing: Qumble: > Open-Source Software distribution for Windows > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > On 31/01/13 14:18, Alexey Eromenko wrote: >> Why didn't I named it "Free Software" ? >> I could put a GNU logo (that GNU cow)... but it has implications, like >> from any brand: >> Users will start asking for Debian-like freedom or higher standard, >> which I cannot provide. >> > It is mainly about what you advocate open source or free software. > I see no problem in calling your project a free software advocating > project and providing binaries that only carry "mainly" free software. > You don't licence anything, you just distribute things that come with > their own licences that explicitly allow you to do so. Whether you do > that by criteria like "Software that has nice icons" or "Software that > lets you taste freedom in computing" is of no importance. > > Imho it is freedom for users and not openness of code that need to be > advocated. > > > Robert > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:02:47 -0500 > From: Quiliro Ord??ez <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Call for testing: Qumble: > Open-Source Software distribution for Windows > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I guess you do not understand the difference between promoting open > source and promoting free software. Neither do you understand the > implications of that. I suggest you re-read the mails that preceed mine > on this thread. I have one more link for you: > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html > > Perhaps when you understand the difference, we could be able to help you > promote your project. >
indeed! -- Jorge Araya Navarro Universitario, idealista y activista del Software Libre. Siquirres, Limón, Costa Rica. http://swt.encyclomundi.net Diaspora*: http://diasp.org/u/shackra identi.ca: http://parlementum.net/sweet Jabber: [email protected] Skype: ¡De ninguna manera, tras de privativo, te espían!. El software privativo en GNU/Linux, al igual que en Windows o en MacOs, te hace un ser no-libre. Deja de engañarte, ¡¡despierta ahora!!: http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html http://replicant.us/about/
