Dnia wtorek, 19 marca 2013 o 00:23:06 Thomas Harding napisał(a): > Le 18/03/2013 21:30, d.dn a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > HTML5 will be a pressure to which the free Software will be > > confronted, but expect to see the results of the work of the > > W3C, and seeing the guidelines that will be taken. > > Considering DRM as "an obligation", the only way such a DRM would > be acceptable in a W3 standard would a public domain or at option > published as Free Software, not impaired by any patent algorithm. > > In addition, that kind of DRM would be based on a key pair owned > not by licensor of content but the person who reads content, with > ability to the last to register on any place she wants.
Such scheme would not work. Read on. > But is really any DRM needed? No. It's bad for culture, users, artists and business. As Cory Doctorow aptly put years ago (speaking, Oh The Irony, to Microsoft people): http://craphound.com/msftdrm.txt This I consider the most thorough summary of issues related to DRM available, if there are better I would love to read them. -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
