-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/07/13 23:29, Brandon Invergo wrote:>> OK, one other thing: we decided that the name "GNU Developer Network" > can be a bit confusing, since some people read it and think that it > would be specifically a dev network for official GNU package > maintainers, which isn't the case. I suggested "Free Software > Developer Network" but that was determined to be too broad. rms > suggested "GNU Platform Developer Network" or "GNU Application > Developer Network". I also raised "GNU Free Developer Network" as > a possibility. Does anyone have any suggestions? Something tells > me that rms will have the final say on this but I'd love to hear > if anyone has any ideas that I can share with him. I would avoid "platform". Platforms in the software world tends to be "places you can't get off", that lock you in and take away your freedom.
Also -- keep it short. GNU developer network sounds nice enough to me. Alexander [email protected] http://plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlHaYHUACgkQRtClrXBQc7XuFAD/fYeSRRyHivw6gbQChiCIxHCf N9O2lvcLKLHj8YqPfDkA/iOTM7IUjeYoHOCTw7PEcNCT/DATKxKKDD8u5+/TWMbL =plSm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
