Not necessarily, but that's where I'm starting, it is is going to be
similar to the mozilla developer network. A friendly, wiki-based method of
education about those languages and tools with example source, example
output, best practices, use cases, etc. Whereas the existing documentation
serves a purpose a lot closer to reading the Specifications of the C
language than "teaching it". Only serving to be helpful to seasoned
developers, making the C Language (and other GCC Languages) a lot
scarier/overwhelming to learn. Microsoft sort of provides this for the C
language with their MSDN C documentation, and this is obviously going to be
in direct competition with that (IMHO showing that community-powered open
source wiki documentation prevails over their proprietary/closed
alternative.)

Also, the extension is very small in terms of hard drive usage, and
resource usage, and will have nearly no effect on Libreplanet. It will just
take a minute or two for a sysadmin to paste it into the extensions folder
and *boom*.


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Rudolf <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the worst case scenario you can link to some free service that provides
> pastebin with syntax highlighting.
>
> Are you basically porting the texinfo docs for libc to wiki format?
> On Oct 28, 2013 5:32 PM, "David Gumberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm currently trying to get a project called "GNU Developer Network"
>> going, which will provided online wiki-based documentation for GNU
>> Development tools, and development for GNU systems. This includes
>> documenting GCC and the GNU libc. The first task is to document all the
>> functions in GNU libc, with examples, best practices, etc. To do this, I
>> need a fast, clean, and concise way to write code examples. It would be of
>> great help if you could install the code (
>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Code) for mediawiki. So I could
>> just do "<source lang="c"></source>". This would be really great! Thanks!
>> (sent this to both libreplanet-dev and libreplanet-discuss since I wasn't
>> sure where this should go)
>>
>> ~David
>>
>

Reply via email to