Are you asking about the blog author's interpretation of the moral significance? They portray a deep sense of indignation, interpreting this as a violation of the author's moral rights and an assault on Truth, whereas the quote's author seems to have a different interpretation of the significance of the issue.
Or are you asking whether it's correct that a little quote can be used without attribution and not be copyright infringement in the U.S.? On 05/31/2015 10:45 AM, A. Mani wrote: > Is this interpretation correct? > http://ipkitten.blogspot.in/2015/05/a-bird-doesnt-sing-because-it-has.html > > > Best > > A. Mani > > > > Prof(Miss) A. Mani > CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS > HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in > Blog: http://logicamani.blogspot.in/ > http://about.me/logicamani > sip:[email protected] > -- Aaron Wolf co-founder, Snowdrift.coop music teacher, wolftune.com
