El 16 de octubre de 2015 17:44:16 GMT+01:00, "Andrés Muñiz Piniella" <[email protected]> escribió: >El 16 de octubre de 2015 17:16:19 GMT+01:00, Pen-Yuan Hsing ><[email protected]> escribió: >>Thanks Bruno, great article! >> > >Yes thanks! Exactly kind of thing I was looking for. I have to read it. > >>Two quick questions about the article: >> >>(1) In it it said: "The cost of editing for a typical paper is between >>1 >>percent and 3 percent of the cost of funding the research to produce >>it." -> Is there a source for this statement? I'd love to see it. >>Because I can use the actual data to talk to others about this >problem. >> >I have not read context. >I am sure this dependent of the field. But one can imagine that out of >a 100 days work in science staff time at least 1 day spent writhing it >will be spent writting the paper. And no more than 10. Review should >take half the time (or less) and typesetting editing is fairly >automatic with tex templates and guidance for authours how to send info >e.g. figure1.png and not Figure0.png > >>(2) It also said: "the word "open" had the last laugh: influential >>campaigners for "open access" subsequently dropped freedom to >>redistribute from their goals." -> Is there a current, standard >>definition of "open access"? Does someone have a link? Sounds like the > >>current "open access" is like "open source", if so is there an >>equivalent term that's like Free Software? >> > >In the intro here (sorry don't know where, I'm in the move) >http://www.jpi-climate.eu/publications/documents/10862501/JPI-Climate-Guidelines-on-Open-Knowledge-extended-version >There was a better framing of what it meant. In the jpi climate >context. >
[Off topic as not strictly software related but I will pull on the 'truism'] The document above refers to this definition http://opendefinition.org/od/2.0/en/index.html which includes redistribution/sharing might not be perfect but a step forward from 2001? >>Thank you! >> >>On 16/10/15 16:32, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote: >>> Hello Andrés! >>> >>> Em Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:54:31 +0100 >>> Andrés Muñiz Piniella <[email protected]> escreveu: >>> >>>> Next week there is a symposium that will be held in Viena >>>> registration seems to be still open [2] to discuss policies on open >>>> knowledge. >>> >>> Just want to point out the related RMS' article: >>> >>> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/push-copyright-aside.html -- Richmond Makerlabs Ham United Group
