Le 2015-10-17 11:38, Robert Call (Bob) a écrit :
We need to stop endorsing centralized solutions and
develop standards for free software projects to host their own
repositories or use / develop tools that aid projects in doing so.
+1 to this!
I got the announcement too:
http://www.fsf.org/news/gnu-ethical-repo-criteria
I am not against identify non-ethical hosting of projects, but we can't
expect to just instill guilt to provoke action + change, and coming up
with another standard, unless adopted and implemented in one of the
current, "modern", acceptable self-hosted packages which would seem
worth the effort.
Would self-hosting with Savane/others be an acceptable next-step (after
knowing your project isn't "ethically hosted")? Probably not, as is was
designed to be centralized, precisely.
Savane also seems abandoned, why (no activity in 6y
-https://www.openhub.net/p/11583) ?
It seems this would need cleanup + updating:
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhyChooseSavannah/
Some hints:
http://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/867/self-hosted-replacement-for-github
http://alternativeto.net/software/github/?license=opensource
Targetting one of them as high-priority to evolve into a de-centralized
model (like was explained for MediaGobling + PumpIO at GNU30) would seem
a logical next step.
F.
--
Fabián Rodríguez
http://fsf.magicfab.ca
