On 11/13/2015 12:54 PM, David Loyall wrote: > Hi. > > I follow a couple "government open source" lists. > > This thread came up: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/government-open-source/9z5ntFwgm4M/HaivecZaEwAJ > > IANAL and I can't advice these 18F people nor the "mil-oss" people. > > Perhaps someone on this list can and is interested in doing so. > > Here is some background information on this FPL 1.0: > > https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2015-August/001104.html > https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2015-October/001254.html > https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2015-November/001283.html > > I hope this helps or at least isn't too noisy. :) > > Cheers, > --Dave >
Interesting. It seems also to leave out the explicit sublicense clause from the other licenses. Maybe that is still implied, but maybe not… -- Aaron Wolf co-founder, Snowdrift.coop music teacher, wolftune.com
