On 12/18/2015 06:52 AM, Mark Holmquist wrote: > On 12/18/2015 05:39 AM, Julien Kyou wrote: >> This pisses me off "Choose Freedom." "Probably the best license out >> there" >> >> >Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <[email protected]> >> > >> >Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified >> copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long as >> the name is changed. >> > >> >>meaning only this document not the licensed materials >> > >> >DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND >CONDITIONS FOR >> COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION >> > >> >0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO. >> >>so basically closing the source is ok? >> > >> >> wtfpl.net <http://wtfpl.net> >> >> I just learned of the existence of this licenses 30 minutes ago, so >> sorry if its not news. > > What's bad about the WTFPL? >
What's bad is the way http://wtfpl.net describes it and is sorta anti-copyleft. Also bad about WTFPL is the lack of legal respect or something, but overall it's no worse than any other highly-compatible permissive license. -- Aaron Wolf co-founder, Snowdrift.coop music teacher, wolftune.com
