These are the Literacy Objects. They are made for children.
To migrate from nouns to objects we must first class time by design to
Identify Object Classes based on Inheritance.
😀 gTime — GalileoTime
/|\ Nature's Creations
/ \ Human Creations
Our language install was Procedural Programming instead of Object
Oriented Programming causing a mixing of Object Classes. With
Procedural Programming you can violate physics, as our species lives
today. It's bad code on top of bad code. Every generation of
procedurally programed adult is more dangerous than the last because
they are farther from the source.
Now, we, the open source community, can deliver common reserved word
dictionaries worldwide based on Computer Science. We can reset
humanity back to nature, and preserve child nature, by class language
by design.
When I say "nature".... A child can be born in one culture and
seamlessly raised in another culture because their physics aware
logic, their nature, is intact. Children are like dogs and cats,
nature, they transcend culture.
The problem is, One Child Nature is born to adults of 1000's of
CULTures. One child nature is born to adults who disregard child
nature and grow culture. We were those children. We are those adults.
Just take the Native Prospective. Revive your nature, and lets get to
work.
love, johnny
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:24 PM,
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: migrate from nouns to objects (Connor Doherty)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:04:44 -0500
From: Connor Doherty <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, Johnny Merrill
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] migrate from nouns to objects
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
At that rate, we should all just use lojban.
> From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 2
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:48:11 -0500
>
> Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 1 (Johnny
Merrill)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:27:24 -0800
> From: Johnny Merrill <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest,
Vol 72,
> Issue 1
> Message-ID:
>
<CAEFPwg5Go-B-em2Y1eMYtPo-ccV=crehurqtfu8_u5b6qpv...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> We need to migrate from nouns, verbs, and conjunctions to objects,
> attributes, and operators.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iewwk1j4I3o
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:18 PM,
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
> > than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 71, Issue 6
(Charley Quinton)
> >
> >
> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:18:47 -0600
> > From: Charley Quinton <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest,
Vol 71,
> > Issue 6
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> >
cajxlmtiest4o6v7k6w1nbazb2wm_80bt67ylgxhtgk5ldvo...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:cajxlmtiest4o6v7k6w1nbazb2wm_80bt67ylgxhtgk5ldvo...@mail.gmail.com>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Are you reading my mind, my document here ->
> >
> >
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MVB1RDkeS4Gh0eRtYhYPXFDK8I2ejcRyXi6ujtJPnH4/
> > or simply listening to common sense, Fabio? I agree
whole-heartedly. See my
> > user page at LibrePlanet.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, <
> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > > Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
> > > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > >
> > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > > 1. Teaching programming and free software to those who can
> > > listen (and everybody else, too) (Fabio Pesari)
> > >
> > >
> > >
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:39:19 +0100
> > > From: Fabio Pesari <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > > Subject: [libreplanet-discuss] Teaching programming and free
software
> > > to those who can listen (and everybody else, too)
> > > Message-ID: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > >
> > > tl;dr: The free software community should teach as many
people as it
> > > can about programming and free software. The best
that can
> > > happen is that those people contribute to free
software, and the
> > > worst is that they become aware of free software and
learn how
> > > computers work, which might encourage them to reject
nonfree
> > > software even if they don't end up becoming
developers. Win-win.
> > >
> > > There are many courses nowadays which aim to teach programming
> > > (especially in schools) at zero cost, but those are usually
funded by
> > > corporations who develop proprietary software and want to
promote their
> > > own agendas and walled gardens, as well as lower the wages of
> > > future programmers (which goes against their purposes, since
it will
> > > inevitably encourage independent crowdfunding).
> > >
> > > The free software community should do its best to make sure
that when
> > > people are taught about programming, there isn't any bias toward
> > > proprietary technologies, and that free software is taught as an
> > > essential concept (like free speech) rather than something
optional
> > > (like "open source"), with an emphasis on copyleft
(otherwise, we'd
> > > be doing those companies a favor).
> > >
> > > It would be ideal to teach free software and programming
directly in
> > > schools, but we all know that won't happen anytime soon for
a number of
> > > reasons, so I thought perhaps we could offer people some
> > > *zero cost courses which ideally, should be recognized as valid
> > > certifications* (can the FSF or FSFE help there, I wonder)?
> > >
> > > Here's some people who might benefit from it, and that should be
> > > especially targeted (since they are snubbed by all of society):
> > >
> > > 1. Poor, unemployed people [Easy]
> > >
> > > These are sad times. A lot of (especially young) people are
> > > committing suicide (or crimes, see point 3) due to
unemployment (and
> > > its consequences, like the impossibility to start a family,
> > > homelessness, mental illness, addiction and debt) and
automation is
> > > only going to reduce the number of available jobs in the
future
> > > (except programmers, until they get replaced by AIs).
> > >
> > > Even if a Basic Income is implemented globally, those
people would
> > > still have a lot of free time on their hands and depend
completely
> > > on their government, which might hurt their dignity as
well as
> > > require them to be "good citizens" and accept every
potential future
> > > law in order to be eligible for the BI, some of which
could force
> > > them to use proprietary software (since most countries are
> > > considering to ban encryption without backdoors, even if
it's just
> > > mathematics, and it's hard to enforce such a ban unless
proprietary
> > > software is also enforced; it isn't hard to imagine a
world in which
> > > developing or even using free software requires explicit
> > > authorization, and only corporations and the government
are granted
> > > it - even if such a regime would last very shortly).
> > >
> > > Teaching programming to these people can help them find a
job in one
> > > of the few fields that won't be affected by automation
anytime soon,
> > > and contributing to free software can offer them a chance
to build
> > > their portfolios and CVs.
> > >
> > > If they want to keep contributing to free software after
they find a
> > > job, good for them (and us); if they don't, at least they
will know
> > > about free software, which is more than you can say about
most
> > > people who work in IT nowadays (who are all about "open
source",
> > > which often just means writing the same programs over and
over in
> > > JavaScript using Sublime Text on Mac OS X and releasing
them without
> > > any licensing info on Github).
> > >
> > > 2. Retired people [Medium]
> > >
> > > Retired people have a lot of time on their hands and they
often
> > > are treated as if they are useless or unable to keep up
with the
> > > younger generations, but I don't think that's true, and
many of them
> > > are lonely and abandoned by their own families and would
greatly
> > > benefit from the warmth of the free software community,
as well as
> > > the sense of purpose that contributing to free software
can offer
> > > (or maybe, just a nice hobby, or a side job because
pensions are
> > > too low, especially now that many adults have to live
with their
> > > parents due to unemployment, see point 1).
> > >
> > > The way old people are ignored and put aside in our
technological
> > > world is cold and dehumanizing, and only free software
can offer them
> > > a chance to participate (because, willing or not, even
old people
> > > will be forced to interact with technology at some point).
> > >
> > > I spent a lot of time with old people in my life and I
know they
> > > like to feel useful (or rather, helpful), just like
everybody else.
> > > I'm Italian and in my country, old women who can't chew
their own
> > > food will spend many hours preparing it for others, even
when they
> > > are close to death, and feel happy and fulfilled when
they see
> > > someone eat and enjoy it, even strangers.
> > >
> > > I think giving old people a second chance to participate
in society
> > > is great, and that they have a lot of wisdom and
perspective to offer
> > > that most of us don't have (especially when it comes to
> > > accessibility, UI and UX. If a granny can understand
something,
> > > it means it's done properly).
> > >
> > > Plus, there are tons of old people who used to work in
software
> > > development, it's just a matter of getting them into free
> > > software. People in retirement age include Larry Wall,
who just
> > > helped create Perl 6, Ken Thompson & Rob Pike,
co-creators of Go,
> > > Bjarne Stroustrup, who's making C++ better than ever and
of course,
> > > RMS. I'm sure there's someone like them out there, maybe
someone
> > > who's worked as a researcher or a C64 developer for many
years and
> > > who can outcode even the leetest of us, and has never
heard of free
> > > software but would jump on it if given the chance.
> > >
> > > 3. Prisoners [Hard]
> > >
> > > This can sound controversial - who would use a program
> > > knowing that it was written by a criminal?
> > >
> > > Ignoring the fact that authors can legally use a
pseudonym, that
> > > I don't know anything about who wrote the programs I use
daily,
> > > that a lot of people are arrested for nonviolent (often
> > > drug-related) offences and that some of them committed
crimes due to
> > > hopelessness (see point 1), people have no issue listening to
> > > popular music or watching Hollywood films or mainstream
sports, so
> > > I don't expect them to react differently to software.
> > >
> > > Some people who've been arrested are sincerely sorry for what
> > > they've done, are quietly paying their dues and would like to
> > > contribute back to society and to be offered a chance to
reintegrate
> > > for when (if) they get out.
> > > (No need to mention those who are innocent or have been
arrested
> > > under ridiculous charges, like free software developer Bassel
> > > Khartabil - I'm pretty sure that if he's alive, he'd
rather write
> > > some free code than not. Please never forget about him,
it could
> > > have been anyone who posts here!)
> > >
> > > Prisoners can already write books and record albums in some
> > > countries; there's no rational reason a prisoner
shouldn't develop
> > > free software and even without access to the Internet,
they still can
> > > write code that can be reviewed (for hidden messages) and
submitted
> > > by authorities on their behalf, using a pseudonym if
necessary.
> > >
> > > There are plenty of prisoners who can already program and
most of
> > > the others would benefit from learning this trade, as
they will
> > > likely be poor and unemployed when they get out (point
1), and even
> > > worse, with a criminal record. Why not give them a chance
to have a
> > > better future, so that they are less likely to repeat
their mistakes
> > > when they get out?
> > >
> > > Even if someone has been given a life sentence (the
"hidden death
> > > penalty"), free software could give them another shot at
life,
> > > something purposeful to look forward to and a chance to share
> > > something with the outside world, to redeem themselves
and leave
> > > behind some good memories of them.
> > >
> > > Prison should aim to rehabilitate people, and free
software can do
> > > that by teaching its altruistic values.
> > >
> > > Teaching programming to as many people as possible, in
general, can
> > > only be helpful for the purpose of spreading free software.
Let's say
> > > you teach programming to 1000 people - even if all of them
find a job
> > > developing proprietary software (unlikely), the chance that
at least
> > > one of them (but realistically, more) will develop or
promote free
> > > software in their spare time and/or as part of their job is
pretty high
> > > compared to the chance people who haven't been taught the
same have.
> > >
> > > Of course, free software needs more than programmers.
Designers and
> > > people who can spread the word (some would call it
"marketing") are
> > > actually a bigger necessity right now - as we have plenty of
free
> > > replacements for proprietary programs but nobody is using
them, like
> > > Tox or GNU/Linux itself - but the idea is that spreading
free software
> > > awareness to the largest number of people possible will
naturally also
> > > bring in some who have those skills.
> > >
> > > What do you think? Any programmers willing to share their
knowledge with
> > > everybody else?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > >
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > > End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 71, Issue 6
> > > **************************************************
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > [image: --]
> >
> > Charley Quinton
> > [image: http://]about.me/charley.quinton
<http://about.me/charley.quinton>
> > <http://about.me/charley.quinton>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> >
http://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/attachments/20160201/ac25c2d4/attachment.html
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> >
> >
> > End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 1
> > **************************************************
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
<http://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/attachments/20160201/21b22a13/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
>
>
> End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 2
> **************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/attachments/20160202/a2db5e04/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 3
**************************************************
