On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:42:34 +0100, Fabio Pesari wrote: > On 02/10/2016 01:06 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> This seems like something that MIGHT be helped, or at least encouraged, by >> the folks in the "Digital Right to Repair" movement. They are trying to >> produce a legal REQUIREMENT that companies release the information needed >> for outside entities to service their products to the same extent that an >> in-house entity would. I don't know that this would drill down far enough >> to require releasing signing keys, but one might be able to make a case >> for it.... If nothing else it would make it harder to block efforts to >> crack the signature... > > Do you mean http://repair.org/ ? I agree. I think the FSF should > approach them.
This is interesting; thank (you both) for sharing. -- Mike Gerwitz Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer https://mikegerwitz.com FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
