On 11/02/16 11:04, Fabio Pesari wrote: > On 02/10/2016 08:54 PM, al3xu5 / dotcommon wrote: >> >> Also if we had a very good 2D/3D CAD libre software but missing a full DWG >> support, CAD users still would not use it. >> But having a full DWG support is really hard... I think quite impossible: DWG >> is closed and Autodesk change it often (i.e. to support new "feature" for its >> CAD programs) just, I think, to force users to pay for new releases and to >> avoid libre full DWG implementations. > > Autodesk is doing the same for 3D modelling with the FBX format. They > are no better than Adobe (PSD), in this regard. > > By the way, for people who know about CAD, I found out about BRL-CAD: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRL-CAD
CAD is important, but why should it be on the high-priority list? To put that another way around, what is the criteria for things going on the high-priority list? As suggested in my earlier email, I feel the list should be reserved for things that just about everybody needs to use.
