Disclaimer: I'm a volunteer for the GPL Compliance Lab, but I am not speaking as an FSF volunteer or for the FSF in any way, shape or form. I'm just speaking as me: Yoni.
As Aaron points out, I think that the respective party's positions on the matter are already well established and don't need to be repeated. My opinion is that for the matter to go forward, the FSF invite the creation of a Libreplanet group called the Free Culture Taskforce (or something). This group will consist of free culture advocates who feel passionate about converting FSF materials to free culture licenses. The taskforce can then identify a number of published FSF works to convert to a free culture license and present those to the FSF (probably in the form of a patch the public cvs of the FSF's website, and probably not the Free Software Definition to begin with). The taskforce will then go on to promote the (re)mixing of those works. At the end of, say, half a year, the FSF will be able to see in a completely concrete way how releasing those works under a different benefited them and get the taskforce to concentrate on the next set of works. This solution lets the FSF people continue their primary goal; the one we are all donating to them to get on with, and at the same time lets the people passionate about remixing and distributing free culture do what they want to do most. -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"
