On 2016-03-19 03:29, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
Fabio Pesari wrote:
b) seem to think that there is some
serious possibility that their work might make someone else rich without them
getting in on the action. Of course those of us who've studied copyright and
copyleft understand that copyright often favours exactly this kind of
exploitation (see the Queen song: Death of Two Legs, for example) while
copyleft has a built in limiter.
I get this response sometimes, but haven't figured out a good response. Can you
elaborate on your point b) and some good responses for software and other cases?
