On 26.08.2016 19:27, Ali Razeen wrote: > I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to > rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree. I believe you > claim that we cannot say that the EOMA68 is “libre hardware from the > beginning” because we have no proof that it has indeed been libre hardware > since the very beginning of the EOMA68 project (which would be T1, in your > email). Perhaps we can claim that “EOMA68 is libre hardware from the time the > hardware is shipped to its backers” when they eventually release their PCB > designs, or maybe we can claim “EOMA68 is libre hardware today” (which would > be T2) if they released the PCB today. But even if they did release it today, > we cannot claim that “EOMA68 is libre hardware from the beginning”. > > Have I understood you correctly?
I think so.
