On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:03 PM, David Hirst <[email protected]> wrote: > This article, published under a cc licence, so freely available, criticises > “free” software and not providing incentives to make it robust enough and > easy enough for clinical use. The conversation is not peer-reviewed, but is > a voice for academics, who are used to peer scrutiny.
There are too many holes in the article. The major problem is of integration/ uniform solutions that may work across machines If there are n number of machines generating data from across many hospitals then which technology can handle all of the data? This is a ML problem, not a free software problem In Malaysia, they have developed and implemented solutions for the scenario. Development of the s/w part is easy. Best A. Mani Prof(Miss) A. Mani CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in Blog: http://logicamani.blogspot.in/ http://about.me/logicamani sip:[email protected] _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
