Interesting... At a *very first/quick* look, the change to LGPL seems to be bad, specially because the derivative work doesn't have to keep the same license, unless it adapts/touches the original work itself.
Andres Muniz Piniella <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Just found this: > > https://ultimaker.com/en/community/50303-cura-license-update-from-agpl- > to-lgpl > > If you read down the comments you can see there seems to be two > contributors that do not feel OK with the change. > > The reason I bring this up is recently I have found that CEL-robox > distribute their own copy of cura-engine. > Only after a user recently asked for the modified files did it appear > on their website: > > http://www.cel-robox.com/forums/topic/robox-version-curaengine-source-c > ode/ > > On normal downloads it seems to default to binaries. -- - https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno - Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com gratis). - "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, use o GNU Ring ou o Tox. - Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard - Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV. - Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF (apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
