On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:31:00PM +0000, Lyberta wrote: > We have GPL that requires access to the source code of the programs. > However, we don't have a license for non-code such as text, images, > audio and video. > > The most freedom-friendly and recognized license for those works is > CC-BY-SA but it doesn't require releasing the source code such as LaTeX > files, GIMP files, DAW projects and video projects. > > Was there any work done towards this kind of license?
You can release non-software under the GPL as well, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOtherThanSoftware By the way, CC BY-SA allows relicensing under the GPLv3, https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
