El 3 de diciembre de 2017 04:45:12 GMT+00:00, Mary-Anne Wolf >Actually, a first person already has, but maybe more than one person >should. > >
Actually I would say less is more. The answer is short and to the point, if I answer I would probably sound like a troll. Plus, it will give it more web traffic than it deserves. I think. But thank you for sharing! The absolute best solution would be to write another industry/trade article featuring a good quality faif project on the same magazine. Addressing point by point the "issues" mentioned on this article but without mentioning it. The magazine does ask for content. I normally just read one or two comments anyway, if there is only one as reasonable and measured as this one, without a response from the original poster that speaks volumes to my ears. Looking at the about page [1] it seems to me the problem is mainly with random scripts found on the internet focused on hobbies (e.g. arduino, python code on instructables or make: magazine). Professionals should exercise critical thinking when doing a cut and paste. Also, when professionals do use free (faif) software (not simply open source) AND free hardware, the industry, in my humble opinion, is be better off. Because best practice could be imitated. The authour also mentions throughout some good points. The title is missleading, I would say using the word 'plague' is a way to bait for a click. It certainly worked for me. In the past, faif licences have also been refered to viral. Thank you for your time! [1] https://www.designnews.com/about -- Richmond Makerlabs Ham United Group _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
