To join in the discussion about gitlab's librejs plan, you can find the open ticket here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15621
Note: You will need to allow nonfree javascript to participate in liberating gitlab's javascript. Best, Michael McMahon | Web Developer, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: 4337 2794 C8AD D5CA 8FCF FA6C D037 59DA B600 E3C0 https://fsf.org | https://gnu.org On 03/27/2019 06:24 AM, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > bill-auger <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:05:58 -0500 Cal wrote: >>> GitHub requires proprietary software (JavaScript). >> most of the github website is functional with librejs, including opening bug >> reports and commenting on existing ones > Yes, it’s indeed much more freedom-friendly than, say, GitLab, which is is > one of those wretched websites, that are not even _readable¹_ without running > ad-hoc nonfree software, yet ironically widely believed to be a better > alternative. > > However, GitHub still imposes nonfree software on you at the moment of > registration. Due to its nature — it’s a CAPTCHA, that is it designed to be > unavoidable, there hardly any solution exists. > > - > ¹ GitLab is actually even more miserable in that respect, than something like > https://code.gov, which honestly shows you faceplate, informing you, that its > developers were unable to create a proper web-interface. GitLab, on the > other hand, presents an _incomplete_ page without any notice, basically lying > to an unaware visitor. > > > _______________________________________________ > libreplanet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
