Il 23 settembre 2019 10:42:02 CEST, Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >Hi all, > >I received the reply below personally > >It includes CC: [email protected] but the message >didn't appear through the list > >Is this because of list settings (requires the list address in the To >header) or because of some moderation policies or because some people >are censored? Can FSF tell us if any people are currently censored on >this list and if so, how many? > >Some people contacted me given the way I have raised concerns about >censorship in other communities recently. A rushed change of the >president appears to be a vulnerable time for any organization. > >After FSFE started censoring communications from elected community >representatives (myself), the discussion was migrated to a parallel >list. If anybody wants to know they are receiving every message at >this >crucial time, please come and join us there, it can be your canary in >the coal mine. > >https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion > >Personal invitations to subscribe have already been sent to many people >I correspond with. It is hosted in Switzerland so any censors promise >to be neutral. Nonetheless, I would draw your attention to the bigger >question: Any list admin eventually becomes tempted to censor things, >which free software technology provides the best way to eliminate the >risk of censorship? > >https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/pipermail/discussion/2019-May/000000.html > >Regards, > >Daniel > > >-------- Forwarded Message -------- >Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] membership confusion, FSF way >forward >Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:19:50 +0530 >From: Nishant Sharma <[email protected]> >To: Leah Rowe <[email protected]>, Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss ><[email protected]>, Daniel Pocock ><[email protected]> >CC: [email protected] > > > >On 23 September 2019 8:48:42 AM IST, Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >>I take issue with this: there is the issue of vetting regular members. >>What if a bunch of members are present who do not share the FSF's >>hardline stance on free software? >> > >I agree. The governance and other decisions should remain with the core >members who believe and support the hardline stance. > >In comparison to democratic governance of a nation, a government >doesn't >ask for views / vote from every citizen on every matter. We trust our >representatives to speak for us and take decisions in the best interest >of the nation. > >Let's have faith in the board members of the FSF and at the same time >keep a check on them. It is our responsibility to keep writing/talking >to them to not let them deviate from the principles and ethics it was >founded on and for. > >Regards, >Nishant >-- >https://unmukti.in - Embedding FOSS >https://hopbox.in - Networking with Free Software & Open Hardware >http://charcoal.io - URL redirector for distributed squid proxies > >_______________________________________________ >libreplanet-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
Yes, and this resulted in electing Garfield (yes, the cat) as a community representative. Please, let's not do this again here. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
