John Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sorry about this, everyone. Daniel seems to have done some scraping and > compiled a list of addresses on his own, from his libreplanet-discuss > archives. This is the list he's encouraging people to BCC.
Well. At least, I hope his list would not be as broken technically as this is used to be: before the last downtime it chucked out HTML parts, so signatures became invalid. When the issue was brought up half a year ago, Ian Kelling <[email protected]> said he was about to look into it when doing a upgrade [1]. And indeed, something changed: now it does not cut parts off, but performs a lossy conversion to plain text. So a message composed with a typical out of a box MUA and passed through this list now have *two* autogenerated parts: one by sender’s MUA and another by gnu.org’s Mailman, which confuses subscribers [2]. Signatures are still broken, of course. My plaudits to anyone who came to that idea. :-D. (That’s besides everything else: mangling ‘from’ field, etc.) [1] <[email protected]> [2] <[email protected]> > I think everyone can see from the past couple of weeks that we aren't > censoring or even discouraging critical conversation here. Sorry, I presumably missed the point; are you saying that messages that do not pass censors are published somewhere else?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
