On 2020-02-24 23:16, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Aaron Wolf, 24/02/20 17:55: >> Leaving is better, but if someone*doesn't* leave, they should at least >> focus on consciousness-raising there. They can do so in replies as well >> as posts. > > Comments may be good, I agree. For instance you can comment when > somebody makes an announcement or opens a conversation which excludes > people who don't use Facebook, pointing out the problems. You can also > comment on posts which violate copyleft, which are plenty: > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/CC_BY-SA_on_Facebook>. On the > other hand it's difficult to do this while claiming you're not on Facebook. > > Never comment on misleading posts or posts you disagree with, because > activity and controversy make them more visible. > >> I agree that it's likely they overall bury anti-FB posts, but >> who knows, it's a black box. > > There was some report about this in the last few months from a former > employee, claiming there was a permanent monitoring of posts with the > word "Facebook" in them, and not just to listen to feedback. I couldn't > find the exact source though: > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Facebook&oldid=942532487#Content_critical_of_Facebook> >
Please if anyone can find that, I would really like to see it, and it would be great to add a citation to Wikipedia. I've presumed that the only option is to tell people to do things like hint at the topic without using the words "Facebook". Anyway, it's indeed a losing battle to try to fight on their terf. But I'd still rather the people there be dissidents than just be passive and still using it. > > Federico _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
