* Thomas Lord <[email protected]> [2021-03-26 02:21]: > Having been personally close enough to see how some of the EFF founders > thought, I will remain comfortable damning the organization in absolute > terms. Nothing in their history of advocacy has changed my mind. Obviously > other people without that direct experience might not have the same sense > that blanket condemnation of EFF is well earned, and that's fine.
Let us just not make a mistake like they, EFF did, and judge the organization by their individual members, or judge their individual members by who they are or what they think instead by their merits and deeds. Th eorganization itself has its purposes, while individual members are there to support those purposes, they may politically inclined to do something else than what is purpose of organization. At that point of time other members are free to express their opinions and report incidents to say if such event should be corrected and why -- as it should be aligned with purposes, which are written in the Memorandum of Incorporation and By-Laws and Resolutions of a corporations. To publish a page where they are inclined to assume political direction not related to the purpose of the EFF is obviously corruption. This may be incited by just one individual, and that one alone may not be aware that he/she deviates from purposes of organization. Reporting, communicating, handles things. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
