* Adonay Felipe Nogueira via libreplanet-discuss <[email protected]> [2021-06-29 15:15]: > Em 27-06-2021 02:35, Jean Louis escreveu: > > developed world like Western countries. Further it is questionable if > > Guix can ever comply to GPL requirements as it was not designed for > > that, I think nobody of developers have ever bothered even to read the > > GPL requirements. Issues are raised elsewhere. Example is that > > published software packages don't have their corresponding sources. > > When package is published online it has to have corresponding sources. > > They do have complete corresponding source, and the ability to use the > prebuilt packages is opt-in, not opt-out nor the default.
I understand your point. That a Guix user can get source by using that command that does not dispute anything what I said. Maybe apparently to the onlooker who does not follow the references I have given. Did you research references I gave you? > In any case, you can get Guix's package definition for example with > `guix edit package-name` and the complete corresponding source with > `guix build -S package-name`. Sure. But how does that dispute the facts I have raised? > This is made clear in the user-documentation which is available offline > through the Info pages system-wide. Does that documentation then comply to the GPL? It does not. How about you go through references in the GPL that I gave you and you tell me how does Guix comply to points I have raised? Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
