* Jacob Hrbek <[email protected]> [2022-02-01 11:25]: > > As I said previously, I will be glad to register FHF or Free Hardware > Foundation for you, US $600 only, it can be done within 1 day. Then you > can make decisions in your own foundation. -- Louis > > If that would help i would already did that, but such approach is not > sustainable many people already tried it see http://fhf.it/
So? That many people tried opening grocery shops and failed it does not mean that there are no successful grocery shops. You have to define yourself, make your plan and stick to it. FSF did that, it is there in the position today where it was not before 20 years. Things don't come alone to success. It needs work. > > You are lobbyist with the conflict of interest. -- Louis > > I am not aware of doing lobbying here, my intention is to make the > argument that what FSF does is wrong in terms of Hardware freedom > and have a civilized discussion about it and what can be done to > improve that. You are not well defined. It is discussion that goes on, you have not brought good arguments friend. Me, I am not from FSF and I see that you don't get what exactly they are endorsing. So you are arguing about something else what you misunderstood. And you will claim, no you didn't. You argue not only about FSF but other companies. It looks like too many issues in one basked. Define ONE issue, and resolve that one issue. But so far we cannot agree me and you. I said that FSF endorsed hardware which may be run by 100% free software, but you claim that FSF simply endorsed hardware. Those are fundamental differences. On FSF website it says that what I told you, but you cannot see it. So if me and you cannot even agree what is being endorsed and this is probably because of English language or other base knowledge, then how can you write a coherent letter to FSF so that they understand your request? People cannot act easily on the type of letters that cause quarrel. Even if your intentions are good, the quarrel will not help you get accepted easily. Another example, you said you have spent money and quarrel how Purism is making money, in the new email you say you did not spend money. But I am not to investigate it, I don't mind. I want to understand your request, but it is changing just like statements your are making. That is why I said first well define what is the issue, so that people can get clear understanding what you want. One issue I can identify is that you are saying "FSF is endorsing proprietary hardware" -- and I said that is not so, it is endorsing hardware which can be run by fully free software. It is regardless of hardware design documentation and regardless if hardware is proprietary or not. Those are 2 different things. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
