This was machine generated via Mozilla DeepSpeech (
https://deepspeech.readthedocs.io/en/r0.9/?badge=latest)
and probably needs manual editing to correct errors and to be properly
formatted.

As attached
happen but of course there happening now but i'd like to thank all of you who 
have contributed especially to geneseo were but also to other free software 
whether you call the program open source or free software as long as it is free 
software then it's a contribution and i appreciate it and the rest of you if 
you were programmers than you can contribute this way and i asked you to please 
spend some of your time if you want to spend it programming please spend some 
of it on developing free software so that we get more of it and we can 
especially if the free program does the job which currently free software 
doesn't do those of the most important programs to develop now some people 
enjoy doing things because their useless and yet that's a part of hacking but 
we are fighting for freedom you can have as much fun developing a free program 
that will do a job there is no free software for as you could have by doing 
retro computing and it beat more useful oh there are some features we would 
like people to write and one of them something that i really wish we had is if 
some free spelling checker had a gender feature so it would when you check one 
word it would tell you the words gender this would really help a lot in writing 
in the languages where you need know the gender of each word in england you 
usually don't need to know but in french and spanish is extremely important and 
inherits even more important if we could put that information into the spell 
checker dictionaries and every time you check one word in your text editor 
it'll tell you that words gender this would be enormously useful in practice 
now you beast a program from scratch program we don't have and that's 
tremendously useful but the program in order to be a eneas work well it should 
be easy to use it should be designed to pretty well obviously nobody has time 
to do that perfectly and she come with enough explanation that people don't 
have trouble using it as a confederate the program first then then you can 
write them the manual for it bad and it should do a substantial useful job or 
else be substantially fun if you develop a programme like that or you started 
developing a program that you hope will ultimately will eventually us meet 
those men those desired criteria that please it in touch with the new project 
and talk with us about making it a gatacre would really like to have more and 
there are lots of other ways to help us which you can find in ganoatohale take 
a look now the free software movement is universal and moralised not exclude 
any one because even though there are crimes that should be punished cutting 
some one off from contributing to free software punishes the world not that 
person i'd like to talk about the state of our movement in adhereing better and 
things better getting burwell one area were something got better few guages 
which have had big improvements in guano have another package archie called non 
gnulemah the packages in that but they're not part of main any sense but this 
is a way that we can shouting which don't have the paperwork and so on to 
include in eastern real problem with them so now we can make users avail make 
us aware of them of the ones that seemed good enough to include new health now 
has a hospital management facility which should make it liable to a lot more 
medical organization so they can switch to free software and do everything in 
freedom and tonewerot a big upgrade but i think it still needs a graphical 
interface for use on educational resemble the other applications on 
genealogical the concepts that we need to that place you can get involved in 
helping now what's getting worse well the leaded mission machines that we have 
are getting older and scarcer finding a way to support something new is 
difficult because until an and are both are both designing their hardware to 
subjugate people if if they were basically haters of the public it would be 
hard for them to do it much worse than their doing and mackintoshes are moving 
towards being jail like the monsters is getting harder for us to install even 
their own programs to run them and this of course should be in legal it should 
be illegal to sell a computer that doesn't let us yes and stalls of their own 
from the trim source coat and probably shouldn't allow the computer to stop you 
from installing vineries that you get from others either even though it's true 
you got to go in cases like that you're doing it at your own risk but tying 
people down strapping them into their chairs so they can't do anything ever 
themselves makes things worse not better there are other systems where you can 
find ways to trust people that don't depend on being under the power of a giant 
company receive problem sometimes were but supported all hardware et de 
supported because oh because it somebody doesn't think it's important any more 
it's so old how could that matter but there are reasons reasons i just told you 
about why all hard work sometimes remains very important and people aren't 
thinking about this issue may not realize that for instance we had to be the 
last usable service was the supported because it was too old and they weren't 
hearing from enough people using it at the capstan you care about that be sure 
to keep the cordeliers informed and we have seen us some aspects of outstarting 
thirty two bits systems and that's going to have repercussions too and shall we 
got to find a solution for that will work round for that too would to of course 
is a non radstowe i wouldn't recommend it any one use it but some important 
packages are now distributed only through their i basically non freedom 
respecting package system and not as debasement than before to get any freedom 
out of an wootton but even if you don't actually try to use good to their other 
dishonest depend in various ways on a pinto and they are affected by this too 
i've seen reports that in wareville many organizations are trying to push 
people away from their web sites and to using a proprietary appropriator smart 
phone operating systems instead now this doesn't seem to be world wide in a 
decorous to find out if this another country where its happening but in any 
case an act is much worse for our prospects of freedom then a website that 
sends non free jobberies the is good to use neither the leye your freedom but 
but it's much easier to figure out how to communicate with the sight if you're 
talking about doing it with a werse then if you're talking about a non free as 
it should it change for the worse is a change from an unjust program you 
shouldn't use to an unjust program you shouldn't use and that really shanty now 
there is a proposed law called coach would require mandatory age verification 
of users which means mandatory identification of users which is likely to be to 
mean by a face recognition and it would be in every commercial software 
application or electronic service that collector now that's grammatically 
ambiguous escorial modify only software application or does it also modify 
electronic service it makes a difference but either way it's a disaster you 
know what things like good emissaries would have to like that fither users 
aparently they are electronic services that connected the internet but and oh 
it all only if it's possible that somebody under sixteen might try to use 
things that almost always the case their only special situations where they 
couldn't possibly try so this bill coaches supposedly for protecting children 
that so one of the favorite excuses for new forms of surveillance of repression 
to protect the children but whether it would actually protect any one is 
dubious but they hope that would actually be checked the other favorite excuse 
although it's a little less likely to pop up these days is terrorism terrorism 
hasn't been such a big problem as to make people so excited about it rightly so 
it's not quite as tempting as an excuse were as protecting children turns out 
to be really important but a house in doing is not obvious but you could always 
propose a completely useless method that will repress every one now another 
error we had problems is that there are several languages which come with a 
package library basically people post packages in them and that might be fine 
if they had a good criterion for the licensing of the libraries people up 
loathest but they're not developed by free software activists and they don't 
have such a criterion there are non free packages in those libraries too now 
some of them make it possible to find out whether libraries free some of them 
is difficult but sometime yet you could probably look at the source code and 
see what licenses are in it and then you could look up those licenses and 
gineralise this list that and see if all those licenses are free and that way 
you know whether the given library you were thinking of it for your not but 
that's enough work to do if they don't help you and the problem is they don't 
help you at the very widest they should make it easy to say show me only the 
free packages and then show me only the popanilla cause i'm writing a po cover 
program and i can't use the libraries that are not to people and i certainly 
won't ever think of using a non free library they are not interested in helping 
people move forward and freedom and so we need people to write from ensureth 
package leakage archives and which will show only the free licenses freely 
licensed packages and which can be asked to show only show which one ejecate or 
show only those and this way they will be usable easily by the free software 
community and if you like one of the languages that has this problem please 
show your appreciation for that language by reconciling its use with with 
maintaining freedom another area where things have been getting worse is a 
containers containers are away of packaging a program together with all the 
libraries of needs are the old way of doing this was you would make sure that 
your program said with versions of libraries it was compiled to work with and 
in the source code you use something like the atalanta i could work with the 
various library versions and this way you could build the program for a wide 
variety of frescoing systems and versions of them well that some work so some 
new developers they release the free program not all orators but some of them 
do release free programs using containers and the container had one set of 
libraries in it and how do you really know what's in there it's not straight 
forward to verify that overlies in the container are free and a lot of people 
will realize that they should even think about it to the use of containers as 
they are implemented nowadays but by people who are not free software activists 
and are not particularly concerned with this question is an obstacle to verify 
that our installing free software well maybe some o these containers systems 
could be improved or may be another one could be designed to solve these 
problems if a container packaging system were designed by people who care about 
freedom they might find good ways to be satisfied this goal as well as others 
so it's something you can possibly work on now i'd like to invite people either 
is a medium size improvement you have in mind to suggest for free software 
please tell the dupotet or tell me because i'd like to sit look at it and if it 
seems like a reasonable thing to do i'd like to add it to general so that we 
get the suggestions out there we can make this something that we contribute to 
and look at and thus help people find promise projects that will really make 
our programs more convenient don't what are we doing to add to bring people 
into the community and to encourage to advance well the free software 
foundation has an idea called the freedom letter and the idea is that it's some 
beginning steps to introduce a onofre software no to the ideas and to trying it 
and one of the early steps is learning about the basic of the philosophy one is 
installing a few free programs on whatever system pursues and then getting used 
to actually using some free software sometimes and then beyond that there would 
be installing ettelson some computer and thus getting a first introduction to 
having a free system now these are the beginning steps because were they bring 
you is participating in the free software community but they don't start to 
tackle the hardest problems the hardest problems are the systems that are 
deeply embedded in society and this is a place where something i said in the 
tenawas quite a few years ago now it is no longer true it to reject some non 
free programs takes stubbornness and determination it's not so easy any more 
and the reason is that some non freystadt in society institutions will demand 
people use them there were vaccination sits that would only let you make an 
appointment if you ran on for joscelind no response to a telephone call well i 
couldn't get vaccinated there i found a place i could so problematical is 
shameful and we should teach governments never to do that but schools were 
doing that very often and reperuse just groups of people who socialize are 
doing it many talks now but academic or other such institutions are transmitted 
over non free software why dressin' see them now when you show in order to make 
a change you got a start saying no it's crucial to have a lot of people saying 
no but that doesn't mean you have to say no every time the way i do what i say 
no every time it's because i never accepted to do that thing and on each day i 
think should this be the first day i yield and start using such and such no way 
i find some way i can say no i breached if i if i you know started to say yes 
after saying no for so many years but suppose you are in the habit of saying 
yes well the first thing is to say no once just once no undisciplined using him 
you know i really wanted to you to move away from us so so right now i'm going 
to say no i'd love to talk with you people i love to watch this but not on and 
even if you only do it once you're helping the movement because it's an 
opportunity to explain to people why it's bad why you don't want to do it and 
you don't have to try to tell them what to do to listen to you better if you 
don't but if you show why it's important to you and you show that you regret 
not participate in but it's because it's something you want to move away from 
in their inner means of doing it not in the goal you can influence them subtly 
now schools are really bad in this regard nowadays and i swore a paper but well 
that a year ago a polish student got in touch with me and talked about all the 
things he had done to avoid running any non free software in his last year 
college and i was amazed by how creative and clever and flexible he had been 
and you have to be willing to do that mastery several different ways of not 
using whichever non free program it is and keep coming up with new ways one 
method that may not be obvious as if the teacher wants you to watch some some 
presentation over zoonomia or goletta well maybe there's a friend will be 
willing to put a web came watching a screen and transmit that to you though 
resorters what is being presented it for the class and the contrast the audio 
took so you're participating in the class at least you lest you see what you 
need to see and may be the friend will email you pedrigano and so on it's it's 
not convenient but it's also not tremendously hard and if you're trying to be 
able to say see if i have not eleians i'm winning this fight for my freedom the 
things like areotha of course add sometimes that won't work sometimes you won't 
find something as one if you have to use an onfredo which is to say in each 
class session i am bitterly ashamed of the fact that in using sonorities 
distaste seconds but say it each time the first time you say anything in class 
on any day in that particular class of any in any meeting of it say that i am 
bitterly ashamed of using zonela you make me do so and over time the fact that 
this is really important to you will sink in i don't know of anybody's tried 
this it would be interesting to find out what there is alarming have other 
suggestions if you've got a new suggestion that whitefoord didn't write about 
well informed the education group because would like to mention it as an idea 
now one way not use non free software is to go through business or even friends 
or avoid doing it online i it is better to ask a travel agent to buy your 
flights than to do it yourself using a toonie non freer now some people who are 
very inclined to generalizing everything and simplify everything to the mass to 
make as many things equivalent as possible they would say that makes a 
difference you know who cares why should it matter whether you use a computer 
or a travel agent uses a computer what is it matter because you're trying to 
keep away from nonprofessionals eliminating the non free software that's her 
ultimate goal but that's a much bigger go freeing yourself is good even if you 
don't free every one else in the process the travel agent is using non free 
software that and has decided to do so you don't you it's good of you free 
yourself a non free software even if it's only you so if you equate every 
possible way that anything unfortunate could happen and treat them all as 
equivalent you make it impossible to make progress you've got to change the 
whole world to make any progress and of course that's very hard so look at the 
differences between different things that are bad for somebody and if a 
traveled travel agitator about running on freestate by your flights for you 
nobody's worse off and you are closer to freedom part of another part of your 
life has reached freedom to its good for you and not bad for the traveler what 
if you want to ask a friend to order a product for you well that's something i 
do i won't order from online stores because i can't pay them one thing the 
payment services require running not for jovite ffrance it has gone to but 
extra care to be able to accept credit card payments without running on for 
software to do it but stores don't care that they do it the easy way which said 
you not fourscore or any online store so asked friends to order things for me 
if i can't find them in any physical store now it's not good for my friends if 
they use soft non free software to do this but those of the french should don't 
care about the issue and they do that every day anyway so that's why it's a 
step forward to ask a friend to do it for you if when the friend doesn't care 
about the issue on the other hand if it's a friend who does care about the 
issue and is trying to quit you really shouldn't ask her to do a bad thing 
instead of you that's a person who might refuse also so you should encourage 
your friend to refuse a long with you now with some sunstones and i don't do 
that because i don't want company to know who i am that that is a different 
issue that applies to the same situation to wrong things that they do one is 
you have to run on foreordering on mine and the other is to give them to pay 
remotely you got to do it by credit card and that's that's tracking people and 
i want to resist tracking too but well if my friend orders the product instead 
of me and get it sent to pureness well that's confusing big brother they think 
it's my friend's purchase but they don't know it's actually for me now this is 
a really serious problem for society that you can't water things remotely 
anonymously what netawis part of the path to fixing that intolerable people to 
get you know you'll be able to get a tower token from your bank or a whole 
bunch of power tokens and then you'll be able to use those to pay anonymously 
and then if the store can send the thing you ought to audley box in your 
neighborhood the store doesn't have to ever know who you are now another good 
thing the power could do is take care of the age verification problem suppose 
there is some sort of service which charge is money or even a tiny amount of 
money and is only for people over sixteen or people were eighteen or whatever 
it is well you could get from your bank a tower token that says he the person 
using this token is over sixteen this bank has verified that your bank you 
verify that it knows how old you are so then the sight only means to insist on 
a sixteen or over powered your age is verified but the site has no idea who you 
are unfortunately that won't help if you your identifying age tracking systems 
or legislated now the code of power works with it still being integrated with a 
bank so people could actually start to use it with real businesses one area 
where we find a lot of threats is in the right to use encryption and to end 
well there is a socialist markets directive in the european union which 
requires interpolation in other words various different services for 
communication would have to be able to use the same encryption method so that 
they could talk with each other and and encrypted and this is being called by 
commercial services a disaster but is it really the services that offer 
encryption and penetration to their users through their own proprietary 
encryption software can't be trusted any way encryption you know you can never 
trust a non free program there's always somebody who's in a position to screw 
you over secretly and it's very very hard for you to check and that is true for 
any website the does encryption and sends you sansonetto your browse to do it 
encryption in the decrepit because that's software control of the sight the 
bennington encryption say you should only be using free software to do that 
because that way it can be studied carefully by experts to make sure it really 
works reliably and safely but in addition when that program is free software it 
means that no one company in a position to do something nasty but security as 
we understand it needs to include security against the developer of any program 
and only free for can do that well but that means you shouldn't be using 
encryption and description software provided to you when in a oh no you have to 
use a free encryption and description program that installed into your machine 
so that all the various apes and sights can use it and that way they can be 
interprete solution for the interpretation for your freedom but serially 
programs to you and choose which one and then we can choose free encryption 
programs and the work interpretations really turn out this way we are probably 
going to have to push for it but properly understood if you understand what 
secure and end encryption means then you rosetted of interruptedly it's the 
friend of using the same secure free encryption programs for every service or 
or communication program about a year ago a service dacoit appeared if you add 
one letter to it it becomes copilot and that's exactly what it does really it 
is a peasant copy a various pieces various snipped so cold without knowing 
worthy come from and it turns out that it is easy to copy substantial parts of 
preprogrammed or non freeborn infringe copyright and not even realize what's 
happening now the fact that is easy to copy a lot of cold whether it's 
fotherington text editor will let you copy a big hunk of code from one file and 
put it in another the difference about copilot is that it will just do that for 
you because it thinks that's what because you know uses machine learning in it 
shows you what you what it thinks you might want there and it's so easy to copy 
that without knowing what you're doing and without checking the license you 
know what if you're copying cod for a spiced program into a program under a 
push over weak license a and you could submit that as a change and you've now 
misliked and you caused a potential legal problem for the project your 
contributing to and some kind of systematic solution is needed for this but 
it's not that it copies it's that it makes it tecora people to copy without 
asking where am i getting this for things like this the solution generally has 
to be to put in a step where it tells you where you're good get something and 
what you need to know about it and ask you is this something that i can more 
fully do is it something within the criteria of the project in trying to commit 
to now this brings up the issue of copyright papers some of the norris in a we 
have four hundred or so nutpicks and some of them are copyright foreshore 
foundation which means the contributors signed papers to assign copyright to 
the effect because in some ways that's better it means now the ffacase by 
alain's of the gifted instead of your having to do so yourself but it's a bit 
of it a little bit of work we made it a lot easier utmost done basically 
electronically and it doesn't take very long and i'd like to thank contributors 
for signing these papers and helping us do this in service purpose to once in a 
while it's useful to change the license of a piece of free coat for instance 
suppose it turns out that it's really useful for a certain piece of cod to go 
into some application which is under saterlee expectations you know that piece 
of cold would be very useful in other places well if all the contributors to 
that cold have assigned to the fifth fennellcourt weak pushover license and so 
can contribute to that particular package we obviously wouldn't want to do this 
too often but sometimes it's good for the community to do it and sometimes we 
want to put in exception permitting linking say bad for instance if you ever 
compiled anything with jess that's probably linked with the library called ling 
which contains conceptually trivial things that just support some of language 
constructs you don't mention them by name in your program but your program may 
need them if you're doing as she plus plus i think some method look up routines 
will be in there so in order to put some cold into there we we need to permit 
none freeport to compile with jessie just not that we think those non free 
programs deserve any co operation but if you couldn't use piled them she sees 
would not be very useful so that's what i decided to do this back in nineteen 
eighty nine or so so bad we needn't want to put some cold into there and that 
means we have to add an exception giving the permission to use it in a certain 
way the cold and lisander the pie but you have a special permission to link it 
in with anything else well if you design a copyright weak and make that kind of 
change there are some people don't want to do that and so i sommers is started 
using something called a cow which has had easterton of code origin and its 
acute but it doesn't it doesn't it very sloppy so i decided to work on an 
improved thesaurus it will not enable us to re license but it will give a 
firmer footing for things like registering the copyright on the program and so 
the idea of the dais to make a clear whose assigning what and make it each 
piece of cod has contributed his sin for by its contributor by its developer 
not by a third party who contributes it but by whoever wrote it percellye 
author of that cold will sign for it and this gives us a firmer but in in terms 
of copyright so that it at mosolente to day and since i always tell some puns 
in these talks i give you a couple of them first rich human bond is formed over 
soup it brotherly love i wish i could see before laughing and when is it 
possible to convert a cracker into a soup when it took biskits now it's time 
for your questions so i guess i should look a big blue button right to see the 
questions yes i will be pasting them in gratitood to keep a couple of questions 
in the buffer to overlap operations can you come reconnoitering ruinously party 
and then run on servers by parties better is that what happens clytemnestra 
shall satiate vague and in general i don't try to judge these kinds of 
questions for me waited in vague abstract ways i think that's the wrong way to 
do to judge it will get you bad answers to enver important to look at some 
concrete examples and judge them ethically and once you judge several examples 
ethically you can start maybe to see a pattern you can try to generalize from 
those examples but so i need nenbutsu of these instances of self sabotage how 
about it to people who are bringing this up type in a description of one or two 
examples and when they're ready you can paste the men and in the meantime i 
will turn to the next question i have you ever considered that copyright trade 
market satrapies by the way that's incorrect copyright and trade more are not 
similar at all and i do not generalize about the period the copyright is but 
it's not monopolization of ideas copyright in the u s explicitly does not cover 
any idea it covers details of expression of a work of authorship to please 
don't ever say that idea has been copyrighted you be confused and you would 
confuse the discussion that follows but copyright covering works and 
monopolizing the use of the concanens of those works is very similar to the 
enclosure weasands was basically separat is vicious in a similar way when it 
used to stop people from sharing now i am not against copyright one hundred per 
cent i think it's legitimate for there to be copyright and for its cover 
commercial distribution and use of oak and to cover modification publicly 
visible modification of the work however non commercial redistribution of exact 
copies should be allowed for any published work now not for private personal 
data but for published works yes and then some words the works that exist to be 
used not just look at thought about contemplated but appreciated now the works 
that are meant to be used by each person but those need to be free solferino 
should be free recipe should be free of patterns for showing clothing should be 
free a clarification of the for the note i beseeched his program to make it 
remove the files of any one from russia if they run it and it was a ottawas a 
practised in many programs so i it sounds like none i preciates a sort of 
library that was included in other frogmore the answer comes up resisting that 
was really nasty that changed to leading people's files as really nasty and 
it's not as if it stietencron you know this could be anybody in russia could be 
anybody in beausobre want him gone but there so being punished so that was not 
a good thing to do it's not a good thing to broadcastin in the hat would a 
carstares on of the p prevent the code for use of the cold for training on the 
asses much like the current version of the perverted from being used in non 
free programs on legally donation copyright law and the things it regulates are 
sins the copyright copyright law says you need permission for the patages the 
ganabara doesn't and suppose you download a program in star to you and you have 
a copy of it well the spell must do anything to you i it doesn't deny you 
freedom to do anything it's just the opposite it gives you permission to do 
things which by before our prohibited and that's possible because we're talking 
about copying of various sorts copying wither without modification compilation 
is a kind of cup it's making a modified version yasodhara things that require 
other permission legally under copyright war so he plays yet you have 
permission anybody has permission under these conditions which is much more 
permissive than copyright will itself will you i don't think you need any 
permission to run a program for a particular purpose like training in a ysobel 
i don't think it is conceivable or a free license to restrict draining the a 
and not only that of the i and the program making examples for it to look at at 
communicating at arm's length it might be hard to decide whether such a 
condition even applied so i don't think we can solve the problems of a system 
that way are there any plans teach newspapers at the to talk about not only 
technical issues but as philosophical issues well i don't know if there is a 
plan for any sort of class but if you want to learn to do that you can learn 
it's basically a matter of studying the ideas having a lot of discussion is 
with people who are taking the idea seriously and raising questions to be 
thought about and practicing speaking now there's an organ there is or at least 
there was an organization cottagers which is dedicated to teaching people 
better public speaking they have clubs join one of the clubs and every so often 
you give it tanerton found it quite helpful i already it had quite a bit of 
practice so i was already pretty good but i learned something from them from 
participating in toastmaster's and i also found it a lot of fun so if you want 
to become a speaker about the ideas of restore you've got to start doing it you 
know find a group of friends find some club near you were they like it if 
people will give it to from time to time and try it and make a recording and 
have other free software activists look there recording and give you 
suggestions of course when you're giving suggestions and criticisms to people 
make a gentle because sometimes people are very scared of public speaking don't 
make the speaker regret having spoken it you trying to be helpful so i this is 
actually very important but i don't know if there's a way to organize it i 
think that it's something that you need to do on your own but if you'll become 
good at this please get in touch so that we cannot give you give a talk and if 
you're good we could put you in our speakers list what you think about free 
software communities strategic capacity that is the ability to make strategies 
against non free software well that's very abstract or i can say is it sounds 
like a good thing but can we do it i don't know what we don't have a large 
number of followers who will make go to goosefoot to carry out our strategy if 
we get only convince more people to reject certain programs because their bed 
for freedom we would be a lot more powerful but as you as you see around you we 
don't have a lot of people who will carry out a strategy which means the 
effectiveness of the strategy like that is not going to be that high what do 
you think about computer quainted so called quoters unquote of wood more free 
games be beneficial for the liberal world well first of all i don't think 
there's anything bad about playing a game and on unless the game is not free 
that is bad for you if you play it but typically these games are not solitary 
you playing with other people and using the non free program together with 
other people that's particularly bad because it means that those people are 
pressing each other to keep running that non free program whenever a non free 
program generates that kind of effect were where it user is pressured by all 
the other uses to continue doing something that's bad for you but that's 
something that that makes all of them ethically responsible for pressure others 
which was you really should stop on now more free games well it's it doesn't 
satisfy in urgent need obviously another game might be fun might be interesting 
it might even be beautiful conceivably but it's not but it doesn't satisfy you 
immediate practical need however that that doesn't but does mean it isn't you 
can't be a good thing booats works are contribution to human culture even 
though none of them satisfies a practical need but the crucial thing is free 
one might make it easier for some people to say let's move off this nonresident 
is free so we can have the same pleasure but without paying freedom as the 
price and by the way or any one who plays mineralist mind test mine test is a 
free game similar to mine craft utan be very sentineled code be rewritten under 
what conditions we bienseant the po but well yes we vereeniging is todoros one 
you want to figure find out the methods that are used to do some difficult 
thing the other is you want to be compatible with it you want to write coat 
will do that same job and be compatible with the other things people use and of 
course when you do that something we need in order to write more free software 
you want to have a free program to do some secret job how do you know how to 
write it if you don't know what the job is to be done well you can find that 
out by reverse engineering some down free program that does that job and yes i 
can be done lawfully but you should find out what the rules are and it depends 
on where you are however the european union as if yuetshi says that it's lawful 
to reverse engineer but to make something that is interpersonal its okada and 
you should talk with a lawyer for advice about how to take repertation about 
permissive licenses but well republications followed most people think that 
there is a blister isn't there are at least two different slices and the 
difference is very important the original best license is a serious problem 
because it has an annoying advertising requirement which is incompatible with 
the p s you should reject programs that are under the original beliefs they are 
very few of them ever since i convinced you severely to move all its program to 
the revised basins which doesn't have that in inverting coats so the revised 
bless not a particular problem is to compatible it a push over license that's 
true but that's not that doesn't do harm it just fails to do good so by all 
means you can use the code that released on the revision linklater's no reason 
you should hesitate to do those things and then the question was batallions but 
that's a misnomer as actually to slightly different lines one of them is the 
excellence and the other is the experience nostrums that you slightly different 
licenses richard why we gave them two different names to me i just couldn't 
read resist to ancient ashes mafuta paper money in you mix it with certain 
solves and headed up eventually become sort of mush and the car starts to us 
that's what i was eating so please don't talk about them it lies for the 
details of all these things look in generalises slash license this list that 
time and it explains the significant differences of course not being populated 
is a very important difference populations such as the gauge the freedom of all 
users of all versions of the coat the pushioned that people choose those 
pushover licenses because her they been convinced it's not nice to say no to 
anybody especially not to a big company how how could you not be kind to a big 
company i think it's easy i think it's perfectly fine to tell a big popayan to 
redistribute my code you better respect uses freedom when you do but as one 
major difference but there are other differences the usual permission wives the 
ones that are compatible with the noche generally don't do anything 
particularly bad if they did they wouldn't be compatible with the p there are 
some other licenses which do have slightly problematical requirements that are 
incompatible such as the original basilicas you'll see a low large number of 
examples and minuteness did or frozen no because it isn't really an account 
they are coins that carry signatures to show their valid but they are not 
associated with you you're the one happens to have them but they're not in any 
way had as being yours so there's no way to act to stop you from spending them 
what do you think can be done by the free software community or the steps 
hardware manufactures towards producing new he broadwell first cook what can we 
do to get them to stop putting in hardware back doors to snoop on people or 
even sabotage them well we would need to organize politically we would need to 
have to be so numerous and that if we told the politician or a don't let 
companies do this sort of thing because it gets people freedom and security 
that they would listen that the politician would listen we need to be so 
numerous that if we wrote to inter and for i think while so i can't remember 
its name but if he wrote to one of those professions saying don't put this 
nasty stuff in the company would start to get scared this is a long distance 
away but we can start growing the proper foundation right now i simply joined 
become a member or more members we have the more we shall wetmore people we 
show we stand for i am not a programme at all but i would like to support the 
development of free software what's the best way to contribute to that these 
days well you could doneated stuff you like and that is looking for though 
nations that's if you want to but a donation but you can also donate your time 
now obviously if you're not a programmer you're not going to spend your time 
writing code but there are other things projects can use especially for 
instance if you are good at writing english text right documentation to explain 
how to use programs if you want to become an expert on user interface you could 
give user interface advice to free programs that would be useful so what do you 
think about croquet and block chain technologies as as love free software i 
can't replace banking systems and other third party i don't think so bad and 
there are things i don't like about crioceris the ones that are practical to 
day is out i don't think it's good that the pay is anonymous because that makes 
it easy to hide wealth and even taxes and that is a tremendous global problem 
you may have followed the news about scandals as data from banks is a weak 
various banks there is one witchingest ly before that there was panamanian 
there was some caribbean island but we find out people rich people are buying 
property in anonymous secret ways so it doesn't get tax and the sentient away 
with stealing it and some effort is being made to make that harder now because 
russian billionaires were discovered to be doing this of course but it's not 
just the masons from any country that want to impoverish the rest of society so 
what we really need to do is changed the legal systems that make it possible to 
own property and not tell the government who really owns it aside from that 
guarantees are not anonymous enough with big one you know you don't have to say 
it belongs to but all the transactions can be traced and so often that some one 
can figure out a coat information is all public someone could figure out who is 
the actual owner of that wallet now with power on the par is anonymous the past 
identify itself retraction and so tolerant be used to hide well however power 
is power is a really anonymous for the peer there is no way the developers are 
quite confident there's no way to figure out from powers who made the payment 
now if you're talking to a website you've got to check the rest of the system 
for purchasing to make sure it really is anonymous may be you'll have to make 
the purchase to retort and of course the sight should not send any jobs because 
dabster information what do you think of tresfarwin and non free languages well 
it was three different things obviously if there is no free complying then 
that's a problem for every program written in that language and you generally 
shouldn't use that language shouldn't be using the non freebooter's another 
reason to avoid the programs written in that language you can't combine them in 
the free world at least now dere is threatened possible causes of bananaland 
one is if it's patented well if the patent holder is really trying to stop all 
free copies from being written that is extremely anti social behavior but what 
of the only existing compliers weedin that situation when i started developing 
the noise she had only not free compliers so i wrote a free compiler and it had 
sent for life under pier that is very hard to build well a chart for me to 
comment about a situation i don't fully understand but maybe you can modify it 
to be easier to build but basically program that written in a language we don't 
have a free compiler for we call tracks there was a time when there was no 
frequenter job and that was a big problem and we are people not to write their 
cotinga but we also urge people to work on a free complied and now draw is not 
grace and most programs written in johore not trap joe i forgot to put it in my 
list of topics to cover but were about to take a step forward in documentation 
i have written a manual for the nose on the effect of his going to publish it 
in a not too terribly long now or why do i say it some manual for benoit does 
not try to describe the standard because that would be tremendously complicated 
and tremendously hard to use it's not just that there are a lot of details in 
the estada it's extremely its ripeness of abstractions but instead of telling 
you what the program means it tells you what the program is permitted to mean 
so you need to think a atascadero level to make sense of the sea standard 
waterpot of this manual is to enable people to learn see and also to enable 
them to look up the details of what she constructs mean it starts with an 
introduction that i think watercart people who know programming in some other 
language and an essential of wrinkles and more complex rules but i tried to 
express them in ways that make it easier to understand see programming and part 
of what enabled me to do that it is forgetting about the standard tchoosie 
standard i iwillie quote conforming unquote if you specify certain options 
which you don't actually have to specify but by only describing what joes and 
not on the other possible things some other compromit do without violating the 
standard it makes the manual much support clearer so i hope that once this 
manuel has settled down people into togather languages that are more or less of 
the same category for instance i think it wouldn't be terribly hard to modify 
the use manual to get a job of manual to what areas do you think the free 
software community could have a role in limiting the damaged gun to the planet 
well i know one way were directly relevant landales as at of west and 
particularly produces lots of waste for manufacturing the new devices to be 
sold to people who have just suffered planned opalescence youth is a lot of 
energy and a lot of material resources so refer is exactly the thing to help 
people keep using the same device for longer nomination consequence of being in 
a community where individuals have more control over what they do and that is 
very important itself but it also enables people to be less wasteful there not 
under continuousness as will direct you into wasteful consumption because since 
profitable for them and if they have less influence over you you can stay away 
from the wasteful consumption before what do you think about it that general 
documentation of the gnosis but something that should explain the tootooch do 
use a system and they mentioned the debarred manual i don't know what the devil 
and reference manual is distinctive in directly from deboutin sure what quote 
dean reference manuque means could some one explain maybe i could be modified 
so as to serve as a tree scalene manual the thing is the boys contains lots of 
programs even is a varied of the gnosis and since it uses leosthenes casters a 
reference manual for deviation particular variant of guasima be those others 
that are fairly similar could use the same one but it partly as a moderate 
whether you try to document you of the command line or use of a graphical 
interface bob the command in if you're using bashes the shallows pretty similar 
regardless of what districts we already have ashman and we have a manual for 
some commands for using the command one however these manuals could be improved 
by focusing on your categories for instance the batsman could be improved 
because currently it groups features under the conceptual level of which they 
operate like a shell programming constructs a buildin but those are matter how 
something is implemented we really want grocers in terms of what you're 
thinking about when you want to use one so ticking of sin you be doing then 
describe in that and in the chapter for that one shall features that are 
pertinent to that i think that would make a manual that easier to read that's 
how i would ragenaire reading it now but those changes can be fitted in any way 
documenting graphical inter faces is a different kind of problem and the reason 
is there not coherent at the death top i use is called mate and do i see 
windows having multiple different styles i don't know why but these are 
programs written by different projects but if they were all coherent which is 
one of the things that the maintainer and most others have not been able to 
follow but you know having a consistent user interface concept but going 
through everything that would be a really good either too many instances of 
adopting technology for your non free just to be a participant in to day's 
society well i don't know i'm not completely sure what that means be a 
participant does that mean running not free jobson with some organization well 
that's usually a matter of a very practical reason rather than to be a 
participant i'm not quite sure what to be rust to be a participant means does 
that mean using an you know a sumptuaria medium raptor because lots of people 
do you know i can guess it when something is very abstract like this i can 
guess at what it might mean but i don't know what it does mean is it a good 
idea to centralize copyright power of so many free software projects over a 
single entity even if the swell oh we know that the is in a much better 
position to go after violators than most individuals are so it's a good thing 
but also aside from the copyright themselves there is the issue of grading the 
licence unless you believe that your licenses perfect and will never need 
changing its crucial to have a license of grade path you know we had sported 
for something like the round thirteen years and then i concluded that there 
were not things that needed to be changed that we had to make a version three 
and there's a list in intergatories there's a page which lifts the reasons 
there many things that needed changing to its right a looker in upgrade path 
but if you're accepting changes from monopole if you don't do any you don't do 
anything to centralize the copyright then you end up with say five hundred 
contributors and how you going to get them to agree to a grade to another 
version the say twenty years later how you going to even find them will they 
still be alive we have to go find their airs to get permission to winter could 
you find them so but if you are not if you're glad that you're not working when 
you powerson then you've got to be glad we made in a great past will wear to a 
white you so reproved conference of war you think there's marian reverencing a 
free software client with intractability for some teams et cetera oh absolutely 
that would be a big advance how hard it is i don't know in general reverse 
engineering is not the easiest thing in the world to do so by all means do it 
if you can and you know talk with the lawyer first it makes a difference which 
country in her might be a particular country which is the best place to do it 
so i think it's time to finish up so i'd like to thank people once again or i 
joining my talk and to wish all of you happy hacking thank you are mestayer one 
nathan please volunteer for the new graces join the free software foundation
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

Reply via email to