Yeah I was just trying to make codedude welcome. My bad. I don't know anything about the subject and it's relation to free software either. Again sorry guys.
El vie, 29 de may. de 2026 1:47 p. m., Jean Louis <[email protected]> escribió: On 2026-05-29 19:11, arielenter wrote: > When would you think that AI will become profitable? Why call it "AI" when it is not? Are you meaning text generating large language models? And why generalize? If you are discussing internal issues of those companies with proprietary models, then I can understand. Yet on LibrePlanet mailing list, I don't get it, how is it even the subject? It is not free software. And just as many other businesses, it depends on your management if it will become profitable or not. Each individual and business separately. > I wonder. I think > maybe when it does something that nothing else can do? I was hearing a > discussion of a table of a news channel today, and they were talking > about weather or not we could live without phones, and someone > suggested that the same case could be argue about motor vehicles, and > I said no way our society could work without transportation, > considering how all our economy relay on it, but I can conceive a > world without cellphones easily. Same thing with ai. Will it come a > time that nothing else can do what it does? I'm not an expert at all, > not even close to understand it at all, but I have heard people saying > that there is a limit to the current model developers are using, > meaning general intelligent may never come. Hearsay. Not relevant. You can make your own locally running and fully free software licensed Large Language Models profitable. You can for example, create a sales pitch and sell that nearest large piece of real estate or big ship, vessels, or boats, and make it profitable. Nothing prevents you. > In one hand, I heard that > AI might solve all our medical problems and such and such, and in the > other, I hear an AI killing us all. Between those two escenarios, I > will rather not gabble and play it safe and not have general > intelligent better. Is better to keep researching, as without researching, making such statements is just spreading fears, uncertainties and doubts (FUD). When first electric cars were invented back in 19th century, there was fear of losing Horse's intelligence by Alfred Sennett. [1]https://medium.com/timeline/forget-self-driving-car-anxiety-in-th e-early-days-human-drivers-were-the-fear-55a770262c10 "We should not overlook the fact that the driving of a horseless carriage calls for a larger amount of attention for he has not the advantage of the intelligence of the horse in shaping his path." Now, how many years after .... human still spreading FUD against the progress. -- Jean Louis References 1. https://medium.com/timeline/forget-self-driving-car-anxiety-in-the-early-days-human-drivers-were-the-fear-55a770262c10
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
