Hi Jeremy,

> On Mar 29, 2023, at 18:53, Jeremy Austin via Starlink 
> <starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 6:54 AM dan via LibreQoS 
> <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> The obvious solution is to foster competition.  Anywhere you overlay cable 
> companies with fiber BOTH companies remain and compete against each other and 
> the cable company increases upload speeds.  If fiber was so naturally 
> superior, the cable companies would be erased.   I have MSP customers in 
> multiple markets with competing techs and it's VERY nice to be able to get 
> fiber and cable or terragraph and cable to a business for resilience.  I 
> cannot do that on single product dominated markets.  The 'exchange' model 
> above doesn't do it because of that single point of failure of the municipal 
> fiber.
> 
> To say categorically that competition is the only solution disenfranchises 
> the sparse edge where it doesn’t pay to have a *single* terrestrial 
> incumbent, let alone two.
> 
> Yes, we will have StarLink, and perhaps eventually some competition to it 
> (Bezos), but there is no escaping the reality that competition in the last 
> mile destroys value.
> 
> Between StarLink densities and this utopia where both fiber and cable can 
> afford to build (and maintain!) enough customers lie a giant wasteland — not 
> enough customers for lines, too many for LEO. Fixed Wireless Access helps, 
> but even in that context competition destroys value.

        Let's be real, even a dwelling unit that can choose between LTE/5G, 
DOCSIS-cable and FTTH really will be limited to a low single digit number of 
ISPs, that is still an oligopoly situation, and we know that 
competition/markets do not work well in such situations.


> You can have subsidy (“Broadband for All” OR consumer choice, not both.

        I argue that if e.g. the same set of "hands" that builds/maintains the 
access roads to the dwelling units would also deploy dark fiber concentrated in 
a few large enough "exchanges", can actually offer consumer choice (by enabling 
ISPs to do what they do best, offer internet access service lighting-up those 
dark fibers) and broadband for all... (sooner or later, roll-out still takes a 
long while...)


> At this point I would hold up an Omnibus-podcast-like sign “Compatible With 
> Marxism”, or “Not Compatible With Marxism”, but I’m not sure which.  \

        ;)

> 
> $.02
> Jeremy
> 
> -- 
>       
> Jeremy Austin
> Sr. Product Manager
> Preseem | Aterlo Networks
> Book a call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548
> 1-833-773-7336 ext 718 | 1-907-803-5422
> jer...@aterlo.com
> www.preseem.com
>      
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

_______________________________________________
LibreQoS mailing list
LibreQoS@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos

Reply via email to